LEHMAN BR HOLDINGS : LEH rescue failed on guarantees
20 janv. 2009•09:42
Lehman Rescue Failed on Guarantees,
Baxter Says (Update1)
By Jennifer Ryan
Jan. 19 (Bloomberg) -- Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.s rescue failed when U.S. officials couldnt find a bank to provide the same trading guarantees that Bear Stearns Cos. received, the New York Federal Reserves general counsel said.
Plan A was to prepare a Bear Stearns-style rescue, plan B was the alternative case, Thomas Baxter, who attended the discussions to save the bank, told a conference in London today. The problem with plan A was the problem with guarantees and if you dont have that guarantee and a strong hand, market confidence in a weaker member is going to continue to erode.
Lehmans failure in September led to the biggest bankruptcy filing in history and prompted an escalation in the financial crisis which threatened to undermine banks around the world. An agreement by U.K.-based Barclays Plc to buy Lehman was blocked at the last minute by British regulators.
The facts are often that people conclude that we let Lehman fail, and that factual predicate is not accurate, that the government let Lehman fail, Baxter said. The problem we encountered on Sunday, Sept. 14, is Barclays wasnt in a position to give a similar guarantee of the trading obligations of Lehman as JPMorgan Chase & Co. gave to Bear.
Bank of America Corp and Barclays were the only two potential suitors for Lehman when officials met before the bankruptcy filing on Sept. 15., said Baxter, speaking at a conference organized by the Financial Markets Group of the London School of Economics.
Cast of Characters
When we started into Lehman weekend on Friday, Sept. 12, we gathered at the New York Fed, he said. The cast of characters were the secretary of the Treasury, Hank Paulson, my president, Tim Geithner, the chairman of the SEC, Christopher Cox, and the heads of as many as 14 financial institutions.
It soon became clear that Bank of America was not so much interested in Lehman, but something else. That was Merrill. Baxter said. So we lost Bank of America. That left Barclays.
The group of bankers and officials was trying to repeat the Bear rescue on Lehman, except that this time officials told lenders that unlike with Bear, you all are going to finance the assets that are taken to facilitate the acquisition. That was plan A, Baxter said.
The problem with plan A was not an absence of financing because the bankers in the room did agree on a deal, Baxter said. They had the money and they were willing to put it out.
The hitch was much more technical, Baxter said.
The problem for plan A relates to, what do you do in the period between the announcement of a merger and the actual closing of the merger? Baxter said. He said plan A failed because Barclays couldnt guarantee the trading obligations.
Barclays agreed to acquire Lehman after a syndicate of banks consented to backstop a new entity that would take over $55 billion to $60 billion of Lehmans troubled assets, according to people familiar with the negotiations. The deal fell apart when the U.K.s Financial Services Authority refused to sign off on the Barclays purchase that day and U.S. officials refused to take further steps to save the deal.
The New York Fed meeting then turned to discuss plan B, Baxter said.
The best option was to put the parent of Lehman into bankruptcy, to continue an operation as broker-dealer at least in the U.S., and to continue a broker-dealer operation through Federal Reserve liquidity, Baxter said. That happened.
Big Time Loans
In the week after the bankruptcy filing, the Fed loaned big time to keep the broker-dealer in business, with funds totaling as much as $50 billion, he said. Barclays then returned to the table and bought the division.
If you go back and study the way we did Bear Stearns, youll see the importance of the guarantees, Baxter said.
Following Lehmans filing on Sept. 15, there was a spiral of confidence disappearing, Tony Lomas, a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers who is administering Lehmans U.K. bankruptcy, told the same conference today. He previously worked on the aftermath of Enron Corp.s financial collapse.
We had a call Saturday night, we were appointed Sunday lunchtime, Lomas said. We had half a day to prepare. In the Enron insolvency, we had a two-week window to talk with management on what they would do if support from the parent stopped.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jennifer Ryan in London at Jryan13@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: January 19, 2009 11:10
L'ensemble des analyses et/ou recommandations présentes sur le forum BOURSORAMA sont uniquement élaborées
par les membres qui en sont émetteurs.
Agissant exclusivement en qualité de canal de diffusion, BOURSORAMA n'a participé en aucune manière
à leur élaboration ni exercé aucun pouvoir discrétionnaire quant à leur sélection. Les informations
contenues dans ces analyses et/ou recommandations ont été retranscrites "en l'état", sans déclaration
ni garantie d'aucune sorte. Les opinions ou estimations qui y sont exprimées sont celles de leurs auteurs
et ne sauraient refléter le point de vue de BOURSORAMA. Sous réserves des lois applicables, ni l'information
contenue, ni les analyses qui y sont exprimées ne sauraient engager la responsabilité BOURSORAMA.